#1 2009-06-16 10:36:15
OptwareWl500gBuild與Optware-uClibcBuild的差異?
離線
#3 2009-06-26 22:20:04
Re: OptwareWl500gBuild與Optware-uClibcBuild的差異?
Opware 支援的平台已經累計數十種,包含Broadcom系列的Router外,也支援市面上常見的NAS系統。
底下是針對 OptwareWl500gBuild 與 Optware-uClibcBuild 之間的差異做比較:
Asus WL-500G
Processor: BCM4702
Architecture: mipsel
Memory: 16MB RAM, 4MB Flash
Interfaces: Ethernet, 802.11G (WiFi), USB 1.1, SPP Parallel Port
Feed: wl500g
Kernel: 2.4.20, Libs: uClibc-0.9.19
Current toolchain: hndtools-mipsel-uclibc-3.2.3
Project Page: http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/FAQ/OptwareWl500gBuild
Comments: Works also on WL-500G Deluxe (4MB Flash, 32MB RAM, USB 2.0), WL-500G Premium (8MB Flash, 32MB RAM, USB 2.0) and WL-HDD (4MB Flash, 16MB RAM, USB 1.1)
Mipsel uclibc based firmwares - oleg and ddwrt
Processor: Broadcom wireless processors BRCMxxxx
Architecture: mipsel
Memory: 32MB RAM, 4MB Flash
Interfaces: Ethernet, 802.11G (WiFi), USB 2.0,
Feed: oleg and ddwrt
Kernel: 2.4.20 and 2.4.33, Libs: uClibc-0.9.28 with patches
Current toolchain: gcc-4.1.1-uclibc-0.9.28
Project Page: http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/FAQ/Optware-uClibcBuild
Comments: Works on all DD-WRT, X-Wrt, OpenWrt, Oleg, ..., firmwares if enough external storage provided
看起來似乎差異不大,只是使用不同版本的uClibc,就以相容性考量及更新速度,有網友建議採用後者套件。
參考資料: http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Optware/Platforms
技術問題請於論壇上集眾人之力公開討論,感恩
離線